Tokina 28-70mm f/2.8 AT-X AF vs AT-X PRO 28-80mm 1:2.8 280 AF. Compare Test


Tokina 28-70mm f/2.8 AT-X AF and Tokina AT-X PRO 28-80mm 1:2.8 280 AF is autofocus zoom lenses with maximal aperture f/ 2,8 and the most popular for everyday shooting focal length. Both models were derived from Angenieux AF 28-70/2.6. Tokina company bought the rights to manufacture Angenieux and in 1994 released the first version of the lens - Tokina 28-70mm f/2.8 AT-X AF, which is provided in this test. Then, after a series of modifications in 2000, an upgraded version of this lens - Tokina AT-X PRO 28-80 mm 1:2.8 280 AF. I had the opportunity to use these two lenses simultaneously, so I decided to do this test to identify how the latest version is better than the first. So start with the mechanics.
Handling and mechanics
As you can see from the photo Tokina 28-70mm f/2.8 AT-X AF has a smaller size and weight than the Tokina AT-X PRO 28-80 mm 1:2.8 280 AF. And it is perhaps the only advantage. In all, the rest of it is constructive loses the latest model.
Tokina 28-70mm f/2.8 AT-X AF | Tokina AT-X PRO 28-80mm 1:2.8 280 AF | |
---|---|---|
Focal length | 28-70 | 28-80 |
Maximal aperture | 2,8 | 2,8 |
Length, mm | 89 | 135 |
Filter thread | 72 | 77 |
Aperture blades | 8 | 8 |
Depending on the zooming and focusing | length changes | length, not changes |
AF/MF switch | No | One-Touch Focus Clutch Mechanism |
The first element when focusing | rotate | not rotate |
Hood | is screwed into the filter thread | bayonet attached, comes with a lens |
Now compare Tokina zooms of optical performance.
Note: All tests are done on the lenses that were at hand; it does not select the best copies, but only single instances "as is." Therefore, tests are not absolute but only relative to this instance's lenses.
Tokina 28-70mm f/2.8 AT-X AF vs AT-X PRO 28-80mm 1:2.8 280 AF. Sharpness test
All photos were taken at the aperture f/2,8 in manual focus mode with confirmation on the green point. For the purity of the experiment, the second model was used in the range of 28-70 mm only.
Sharpen in the near field in the center of the frame
100% Crops
28mm
50mm
70mm
As can be seen from the examples, Tokina AT-X PRO 28-80mm 1:2.8 280 AF sharper than its predecessor.
Sharpness at Infinity
28mm
Crop 100%
70mm
Crop 100%
Here is a small advantage of Tokina 28-70mm f / 2.8 AT-X AF.
Bokeh Test
Bokeh is subjective stuff. Moreover, it may be different depending on the subjects. Here are a few examples of bokeh with different subjects. I took the photo at 70mm focal length.
Crop 100%
At the Tokina AT-X PRO, 28-80mm f/2.8 AF 280 visible "onion rings" in the circles. While the first lens does not. Personally, I liked more bokeh Tokina 28-70mm f / 2.8 AT-X AF. I think it is more air; the picture is more artistic.
Contrast and Flare
28mm Tokina 28-70mm f/2.8 AT-X AF
28mm Tokina AT-X PRO 28-80mm 1:2.8 280 AF
70mm Tokina 28-70mm f/2.8 AT-X AF
70mm Tokina AT-X PRO 28-80mm 1:2.8 280 AF
Both lenses have good contrast and well with strong side light. But at the same time, both strongly fear direct backlight, especially on the long end. It seemed to me, Tokina AT-X PRO 28-80mm 1:2.8 AF 280 copes better with backlight. Maybe an important role in this is constructive - front lens focal lengths under certain deep-seated in the barrel, which partially protects the lens from stray light. In the first version, such construction is not provided.
Conclusion
As shown by examples, both lenses have good optical performance. Yet, the model AT-X PRO 28-80mm 1:2.8 AF 280 has better sharpness and contrast. But the 28-70mm f/2.8 AT-X AF, in my opinion, has a more artistic image. Also, AT-X PRO 28-80mm has much better construction. He is about 50-70 dollars more expensive first. So which lens one is more like it, you decide.
Tristan
Wed, 2017-02-08 06:31
Photopolitan
Tue, 2018-06-05 04:43
Arnold
Sun, 2018-12-23 01:02
M.D.
Fri, 2020-10-23 22:10
M.D.
Fri, 2020-10-23 22:16
Derekwourb
Tue, 2021-09-07 08:17
Derekwourb
Wed, 2021-09-08 09:59
Chinaenlic
Fri, 2022-02-04 15:49
Chinaenlic
Sat, 2022-02-05 19:03
ErikaAmoug
Thu, 2022-02-17 19:44
CharlesLob
Wed, 2022-03-09 22:02
Jesseinfib
Fri, 2022-03-11 08:55
TrudeymaOi
Thu, 2022-07-21 20:12
GlynnismaOi
Sat, 2022-07-23 06:54
SuzannmaOi
Sun, 2022-07-24 05:56
SallimaOi
Mon, 2022-07-25 00:22
DarsiemaOi
Mon, 2022-07-25 20:29
TandimaOi
Mon, 2022-07-25 21:21
MabellemaOi
Tue, 2022-07-26 18:19
TandimaOi
Tue, 2022-07-26 22:25
JenneemaOi
Wed, 2022-07-27 15:59
AbagaelmaOi
Wed, 2022-07-27 23:29
HerminamaOi
Thu, 2022-07-28 12:38
ShaylamaOi
Thu, 2022-07-28 22:58
AudremaOi
Fri, 2022-07-29 08:22
VerenamaOi
Fri, 2022-07-29 21:55
HestiamaOi
Sat, 2022-07-30 04:16
DixiemaOi
Sat, 2022-07-30 20:22
LaureenmaOi
Sun, 2022-07-31 18:13
FrannimaOi
Mon, 2022-08-01 18:59
PearlmaOi
Tue, 2022-08-02 17:20
BobbiemaOi
Wed, 2022-08-03 15:44
LesliemaOi
Thu, 2022-08-04 14:07
TrudiemaOi
Sun, 2022-08-07 13:52
HonormaOi
Sun, 2022-08-07 21:47
JaynellmaOi
Mon, 2022-08-08 13:12
TeddiemaOi
Mon, 2022-08-08 18:01
DulceamaOi
Tue, 2022-08-09 21:04
JenneemaOi
Wed, 2022-08-10 02:33
CarolanmaOi
Wed, 2022-08-10 21:08
JenneemaOi
Wed, 2022-08-10 22:49
AshleighmaOi
Thu, 2022-08-11 19:02
FanyamaOi
Thu, 2022-08-11 20:32
KelseymaOi
Fri, 2022-08-12 15:50
CarolinmaOi
Fri, 2022-08-12 20:56
LaurellamaOi
Sat, 2022-08-13 14:18
FifinemaOi
Sat, 2022-08-13 20:21
FifinemaOi
Sun, 2022-08-14 15:18
SheelaghmaOi
Sun, 2022-08-14 21:37
FifinemaOi
Mon, 2022-08-15 11:32
Pages